New LB idea

by **Terminator** » Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:58 am

I've submitted loads, but from time to time I will post them here after to see what the community thinks. Here goes:

Some people are able to create un penatratable fortresses and hide aways using obstacles. Essentially this is a flaw in the gameplay as it means many players can hide away making game activity useless sometimes. My solution to this is for obstacles to lose their invincibility. Obstacles should have the same 'life' as a sergeant for example. If it is shot at repeatedly, it will gain cracks when it has a quarter of its 'life' left. Once it has run out, it will break into rubble which will dissapear after a few seconds, whilst broken dual shots and normal shots will be able to fire over it, so treat it like an obstacle in water. It will re appear randomly at full 'life' somewhere on the map and would make it fun when breaking bases or players who constantly hide behind obstacles on raids.

With my limited paint skill i made a mockup of what it could look like.

Thanks, Terminator_Is_Back

by **Liquified** » Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:43 am

Garbage

by **Terminator** » Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:47 am

At least say why lol, it probably is but im looking for feedback

by **megaGOD** » Fri Aug 24, 2012 11:23 am

xxxterminator2 wrote:Some people are able to create un penatratable fortresses and hide aways using obstacles. Essentially this is a flaw in the gameplay as it means many players can hide away making game activity useless sometimes.

no base takes more than 2 min to destroy.

by **Terminator** » Fri Aug 24, 2012 11:54 am

atelo wrote:
xxxterminator2 wrote:Some people are able to create un penatratable fortresses and hide aways using obstacles. Essentially this is a flaw in the gameplay as it means many players can hide away making game activity useless sometimes.

no base takes more than 2 min to destroy.

Did you see the one in deep 6 the other day, it was there for the duration of the time the map was up being held up by a few blues..

by **Seven** » Fri Aug 24, 2012 12:26 pm

xxxterminator2 wrote:Did you see the one in deep 6 the other day, it was there for the duration of the time the map was up being held up by a few blues..

I saw the one on D6 I switched to my blue tank to take it down but guess what. It wasnt possible. The only two free rocks where being held on to by a guest and wet socks. No life people with nothing but time to kill because they have absolutely no life.

Your idea is flawed though. What if the base maker just shoots the rocks himself making them spawn out of his base. A blue tank cant destroy a blue mine. Maybe the better idea would be that a blue player could shoot his own mine and blow it up. But then you take away the challenge of having a base. Bases should be here to stay as gay as that D6 shit was the other night it didnt matter. Those players hiding in there are players that don't take raids anyway. Let them waste their time thinking they are awesome at being annoying.

by **savin** » Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:09 pm

I read wet socks is zub somewhere on this forum.

by **Jordann** » Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:52 pm

lolol at everyone getting so mad a small square is being held. wtf do you guys want to do in that castle? Oh yeah create your own damn base. Jesus some of you guys cry for stupid shit.

by **Liquified** » Thu Sep 06, 2012 7:53 pm

no dont stop crying i enjoy laughing out loud when i browse the forums

by **Terminator** » Fri Sep 07, 2012 6:20 am

Revive a dead thread why?

by **lefty** » Fri Sep 07, 2012 7:18 am

bad idea but I see another LB coming since you won last month for duplicate ideas and stuff that will never be used. I'm pretty sure because of your illustrations and for no other reason.

:shrug:

by **Terminator** » Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:17 pm

lefty wrote:bad idea but I see another LB coming since you won last month for duplicate ideas and stuff that will never be used. I'm pretty sure because of your illustrations and for no other reason.

that was one of my last months entries, stop hating because you got a wc after 7 months of trying, i haven't even entered this month but i got two strong ideas i can submit but i don't want to at the moment , may create a new tank to do it though. Illustrations put your idea into perspective, nobody including myself likes to process large chunks of information.

by **Trunks** » Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:52 pm

I thought it was a decent idea, but to appease some of the controversy on it, why have it reappear somewhere else?
If people like the idea of having a base that takes times to create and one that can hold then give them like a 3-4 min timer to rebuild themselves in the same spot.
On the other hand, it isnt too much of a hassle to move one brick at a time so why fix something that isnt broken.

:um:

by SW » Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:47 am

It is an interesting idea. Probably would neither improve nor decrease the quality of the game. Also probably not worth the effort to add.

by **PRIDE** » Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:46 am

seemed like a good idea for destroying obstacles on ferries mainly

by **Shazam** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:34 pm

agreed frog

he should pop a glock on himself and make a brain slushie

by **Shazam** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:53 pm

10 megaton bombsssssssssssssss

by **Terminator** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:56 pm

droppin bombs on your moms face :finger:

by **Shazam** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:56 pm

i can see him readin the thread, but he too pussy to respond to us

he prolly scared cuz he knows we tankpit gods

by **Shazam** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:58 pm

frog, i like it when you call him a clown, cuz he is a clown

by **Shazam** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:59 pm

nice frog

by **Terminator** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:11 pm

When you're finished rubbing each other's nuts, maybe you can make a decent post where you aint your only fan lol.

and your material is weak. Shazam you got some brown stuff on your nose..